SELECTED PUBLICATIONS

Towards a Needs-Based Approach: A Framework for Engaging External Actors in Reconstruction in Syria

This report puts forward a framework highlighting the priority needs of Syrians in reconstruction across four dimensions: livelihoods, housing, infrastructure, and services. These sectors are analyzed in terms of previous lessons learned in cases of post-conflict reconstruction, as well as the pre-conflict reality in Syria. The external priorities and engagement in Syria of Russia, Iran, China, Turkey, the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), and various additional actors are addressed in particular, according to the framework of needs. The report finds that there is a need for overall reconstruction of Syria to be guided along a core set of principles that improve livelihoods, build sustainable infrastructure, provide affordable housing, and enhance services. Going forward, there are steps that need to be taken to ensure a needs-based approach to reconstruction. Firstly, transparency around external engagement in Syrian reconstruction needs to be improved. Secondly, coordination around reconstruction activities should be increased with an eye towards serving the needs of the population. Finally, a guiding shared statement of principles will be critical. While there may be no optimal middle ground to be found in the crisscross of diverse political agendas that converge in Syria, there needs to be a more concerted effort to put the needs of the Syrian people first in all initiatives being undertaken.

International Consequences of the Militarization of U.S. Policing

Contributor to The Navigator, The Center for Global Policy, June 24, 2020

The current moment is critical for the United States to reform policing practices both internally and internationally. A full re-conceptualization of the components of policing and the development of programming sensitive to the negative aspects of inappropriate militarization can provide a pathway for the country to rebuild its programming both domestically and abroad in this area. A willingness to engage with activists and leaders from marginalized communities and international bodies, and a public acknowledgement and rectification of past and present problematic partnerships, will allow for positive change both domestically and in Washington’s engagements in the international community.